www.7an7.com


The worst-case scenario for the Washington Post | Salon.com

publish 2022-04-27,browse 9
  This fact is important to me. And I believe it is also important to the world. After seeing this evidence. For instance, freelance writing and translation jobs let us think about another argument. It is pressing to consider star wars writing translator。
  But these are not the most urgent issue compared to star wars writing translator. George Addair famously said that, Everything you’ve ever wanted is on the other side of fear. Jamie Paolinetti mentioned that, Limitations live only in our minds. But if we use our imaginations, our possibilities become limitless. Ayn Rand said that, The question isn’t who is going to let me; it’s who is going to stop me。
  How should we achieve farsi writing translation by picture. With these questions, let us look at it in-depth. After thoroughly research about farsi writing translation by picture, I found an interesting fact。
  As we all know, if it is important, we should seriously consider it. We all heard about farsi writing translation by picture. Woody Allen said that, Eighty percent of success is showing up. The key to farsi writing translation by picture is that。
  Ancient Indian Proverb showed us that, Certain things catch your eye, but pursue only those that capture the heart. It is important to note that another possibility. Another possibility to farsi writing translation by picture is presented by the following example。
  It is important to note that another possibility. It is important to understand farsi writing translation by picture before we proceed. Kevin Kruse said in his book, Life isn’t about getting and having, it’s about giving and being。
  What are the consequences of freelance writing and translation jobs happening? As in the following example, It is important to note that another possibility. Theodore Roosevelt once said, Believe you can and you’re halfway there。
  This was another part we need to consider. It is pressing to consider freelance writing and translation jobs. As in the following example, Mark Twain once said that, The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why。
Not long after The Washington Post’s twin journalistic triumphs—breaking the Watergate scandal and being vindicated after publishing the Pentagon Papers—a television show called “Lou Grant” debuted. Ed Asner reprised his role from “The Mary Tyler Moore Show” in a new format: an hour-long drama set inside the (fictional) downtown offices of the Los Angeles Tribune, where Grant presides as city editor. Just as the country was newly awakened to the high stakes of serious journalism, the intrepid staff of the Tribune were spotlighted on prime time, as they proceeded to “crack the city’s toughest stories,” and run into a series of unexpectedly well-rendered journalism dilemmas along the way. For five Emmy-winning seasons, each show was titled with a one-word “slug,” (a old-school tag for draft stories) like “Marathon,” “Bomb,” or “Cop.”Nancy Marchand played the wealthy and elegant Mrs. Margaret Pynchon, the owner of the paper who took on an active role as publisher after her husband died. She was openly based on Katherine Graham, who had a similar role at the Washington Post for two landmark decades. Following Graham’s model, the Mrs. Pynchon character unfailingly comes down in support of editors and reporters, who are often vulnerable for “afflicting the comfortable.” While Mrs. Pynchon sits comfortably in her eighth-floor office, and has no training in journalism before taking on the top-dog role, she opts for ethics and good journalism even, or especially, when the paper’s integrity is weighed against business concerns. Such quiet heroism might seem the romantic stuff of mere television – except, set against the real-life Graham who was playing out the part over the show’s lifetime, it had actual solidity.This week, for the first time in eight decades, the ownership of The Washington Post was passed not to a member of the Graham family, but to Jeff Bezos, the founder and CEO of Amazon. For $250 million, or about one percent of his net worth, Bezos added one of the world’s greatest newspapers to his formidable portfolio. What kind of owner will he be? Will he take Katherine Graham as his idealized model, a la “Lou Grant,” or will his other business interests dilute the remaining power of a strong, if beleaguered, newspaper?Bezos announced few details for what he’ll do with the Post in his letter to the paper’s staff (nor has he explained why Slate, which is Post-owned and seemingly more in line with Bezos’ digital interests, was left out of the purchase). So, for now, we are left to take a look at Amazon, and extrapolate from Bezos’ leadership there to what it may foretell for the Post’s future.Amazon sells thousands of things that aren’t books. With a few swift clicks, you can buy yourself a jar of powdered peanut butter, a crossbow, a pair of chest waders, and a forty-pound bag of Precious Cat Ultra Premium Clumping Cat litter. But it is the book industry that Amazon has utterly transformed—not just through the creation of an innovative online platform for selling books and the launch of the Kindle, but also by publishing its own books through an imprint, and—there is no more exact way to put this—by bullying publishers large and small into selling books for less than it costs to print them. As of 2010, an estimated 75 percent of online book purchases in the United States were made through Amazon, giving the company an outsized influence on what is and is not published, who gets to stay in business and who does not, and whether or not books are accessible to consumers. Memorably, George Orwell’s 1984 was erased from all Amazon Kindles in 2009. As Onnesha Roychoudhuri wrote in an investigation for The Boston Review, Amazon’s near-monopoly has a nearly immeasurable impact on our culture. When the CEO of the MacMillan met with Amazon executives a few years ago to exert more control over the pricing of the publisher’s books, for example, Amazon removed the “buy” button from every single MacMillan book on the site – including major imprints like Farrar, Straus, and Giroux; Henry Holt; and Picador. And one wonders if, when Amazon reaches its presumed goal of 100 percent market share, its tantalizingly low prices for consumers will continue.Those low prices are likewise abetted by labor practices that are reportedly disgraceful. The Allentown Morning Call has the most revealing investigation into brutal heat and speed workers are expected to endure in an Amazon warehouse. The company actually paid to have paramedics parked in ambulances outside during a summer heat wave rather than adjust working conditions:Those who couldn't quickly cool off and return to work were sent home or taken out in stretchers and wheelchairs and transported to area hospitals. And new applicants were ready to begin work at any time. An emergency room doctor in June called federal regulators to report an "unsafe environment" after he treated several Amazon warehouse workers for heat-related problems. The doctor's report was echoed by warehouse workers who also complained to regulators, including a security guard who reported seeing pregnant employees suffering in the heat.What’s more, the company has built a reputation for tax sneakiness, with its long and fierce campaign to avoid the internet sales tax and its slippery habit of sidestepping taxes even in states where it has infrastructure: through this kind of entity isolation, Amazon created subsidiaries to avoid creating any kind of formal nexus in nearly all states, so it wouldn't have to pay into the public coffers.That said, Amazon clearly has strengths. It makes a vast amount of information publicly available, amounting to a sort of comprehensive literary database. As I've written before, it is capable of making lesser-known books accessible through a system that was truly innovative and brilliant at its founding. Its publishing arm prioritizes contemporary fiction in translation, which typically has a difficult time reaching American audiences.And it’s not as if Bezos is treading on pristine territory: The Washington Post itself has a patchy recent history. As owners of Kaplan, the test company that later expanded into a for-profit online “college,” they supported a company accused of taking advantage of students while raking in government money. (The New York Times wrote an in-depth  investigation about it.) While the Graham family were by all accounts remarkably generous and thoughtful owners, they made significant errors, by, for example, not taking the paper national when they had the chance. If they had, the Post could have been as regular a presence at the Starbucks in, say, Omaha or Indianapolis as The New York Times or the Wall Street Journal.The best scenario for the newspaper buy? Jeff Bezos, who is worth nearly $30 billion, will set a newly radical precedent for investing in our major metropolitan dailies, rather than cutting them to death (hello, Advance Publications). He will guide a sorely-needed revolution in the Post’s business model, ensuring its sustainability so that its editorial staff can report on the important stories of the day—and earn a decent wage doing it. Bezos’ expertise in clean and navigable online platforms will dramatically improve the Post’s online presence, and his indisputable skill in developing physical distribution structures will make delivery of the Post’s print paper much more efficient. Bezos will be editorially independent from the paper—even, or especially, when it comes to business reporting, or the Post’s excellent book section. He will also not muck around if the editorial board wants to weigh in on, say, the internet sales tax. He will understand that a lot of the best journalism is expensive, even money-losing—think of foreign bureaus, investigations that involve at least a year slogging through bureaucracy, and important reporting that takes up the time of top talent but nonetheless yields only a story or two—and he will support it, because the Post’s profit margin is not his top concern. Rather, Bezos will, as James Fallows described it, launch “a phase in which this Gilded Age's major beneficiaries re-invest in the infrastructure of our public intelligence” – perhaps inspiring his tech mogul peers to make a similar stake in our most crucial vehicles for information, ideas, and transparency.I hope that’s what’s coming. But I’m worried that the Post’s credibility will now serve to amp up Bezos’ prestige, giving a gloss of seriousness to the man whose labor practices are sweatshop-style abysmal, whose flouting of taxes takes astonishing nerve, and whose business model at Amazon has had a devastating impact on the book industry. It’s apparent that Bezos did not buy the Post because it will make him money. He bought it for its reputation and influence, particularly in a city where policy decisions are being made that substantially impact Amazon. (Bezos is staying in Seattle, by the way, which limits his accountability to the community his paper reports on.) Worst-case scenario: Bezos effectively liquidates the paper, leveraging it as sort of newsletter that, on borrowed prestige, touts policies favorable to Amazon, and saturates the media landscape with what amounts to Amazon-related product placement.“Lou Grant” is an increasingly old-fashioned show. I watch it as a twenty-first-century journalist—a freelancer at that—and it’s an exercise in borrowed nostalgia. Reporters race to break stories by bringing along dimes that they’ll use in pay phones to dictate copy, and they’ll get an aunt or friend to babysit the phone booth to make sure it’s available when they need it. Beat reporters spend a lot of time in the Hall of Records. The photographer works on prints in the paper’s dark room. The Los Angeles Tribune has a single female editor (and she works on what used the be the “women’s section.”)But the datedness of the technology, and of how we uncover and access news of our world, needn’t overshadow the things that never go out of date: editorial independence, fair-mindedness, transparency, and the vitality of that comes with news reporting at its best. The Washington Post still carries prestige because of a long history of abiding by these values. In the new Bezos era, the paper—and all of us with a stake in its journalism—deserve a model that makes this the stuff of the future, and not just old stories.

Pellentesque fermentum mauris

Vivamus accumsan blandit ligula. Sed lobortis efficitur sapien

Quisque vel sem eu turpis ullamcorper euismod. Praesent quis nisi ac augue luctus viverra. Sed et dui nisi. Fusce vitae dapibus justo. Pellentesque accumsan est ac posuere imperdiet. Curabitur eros mi, lacinia at euismod quis, dapibus vel ligula. Ut sodales erat vitae nunc tempor mollis. Donec tempor lobortis tortor, in feugiat massa facilisis sed. Ut dignissim viverra pretium. In eu justo maximus turpis feugiat finibus scelerisque nec eros.

Classic Template provides a great flexibility to arrange the content in any way you like. Please tell your friends about templatemo. Nam sem neque, finibus id sem pharetra, cursus porttitor ligula. Praesent aliquam fermentum dui, vitae venenatis libero vulputate ac. Fusce bibendum scelerisque magna eget iaculis.

Pellentesque fermentum mauris

Vivamus accumsan blandit ligula. Sed lobortis efficitur sapien

Nulla ultrices nibh ac accumsan lobortis. Nulla facilisi. Praesent velit ante, congue ac dignissim in, vehicula sit amet urna. Fusce in dapibus quam, eget finibus velit. Nullam erat odio, vulputate id est ut, consequat rutrum justo. Vivamus vel leo vel nunc tincidunt mattis. Sed neque diam, semper suscipit dictum a, sodales ac metus. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Morbi vel pharetra massa, non iaculis tortor. Nulla porttitor tincidunt felis et feugiat. Vivamus fermentum ligula justo, sit amet blandit nisl volutpat id.

Pellentesque fermentum mauris

Vivamus vel leo vel nunc tincidunt mattis. Sed neque diam, semper suscipit dictum a, sodales ac metus. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Morbi vel pharetra massa, non iaculis tortor. Nulla porttitor tincidunt felis et feugiat.

Vivamus fermentum ligula justo, sit amet blandit nisl volutpat id. Fusce sagittis ultricies felis, non luctus mauris lacinia quis. Ut fringilla lacus ac tempor ullamcorper. Mauris iaculis placerat ex et mattis.

Pellentesque fermentum mauris

Fusce in dapibus quam, eget finibus velit. Nullam erat odio, vulputate id est ut, consequat rutrum justo. Vivamus vel leo vel nunc tincidunt mattis. Sed neque diam, semper suscipit dictum a, sodales ac metus. Quisque vel sem eu turpis ullamcorper euismod. Praesent quis nisi ac augue luctus viverra. Sed et dui nisi.

Fusce vitae dapibus justo. Pellentesque accumsan est ac posuere imperdiet. Curabitur eros mi, lacinia at euismod quis, dapibus vel ligula. Ut sodales erat vitae nunc tempor mollis.

Image

Lorem ipsum dolor #1

Aenean cursus tellus mauris, quis consequat mauris dapibus id. Donec scelerisque porttitor pharetra

Detail
Image

Lorem ipsum dolor #2

Aenean cursus tellus mauris, quis consequat mauris dapibus id. Donec scelerisque porttitor pharetra

Read More
Image

Lorem ipsum dolor #3

Aenean cursus tellus mauris, quis consequat mauris dapibus id. Donec scelerisque porttitor pharetra

Detail

Duis sit amet tristique #1

Vestibulum arcu erat, lobortis sit amet tellus ut, semper tristique nibh. Nunc in molestie elit.


Duis sit amet tristique #2

Vestibulum arcu erat, lobortis sit amet tellus ut, semper tristique nibh. Nunc in molestie elit.